Agnes AI vs Groq
Compare Agnes AI and Groq: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
LLM
API Platform
Rating
β 4
β 5
Free Credits
0 undefined
1000 requests/day
Refresh Period
unlimited
daily
Resolution
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
Yes
Yes
Paid From
Token Plan (monthly/yearly, higher TPS and quotas)
Pay-as-you-go
Agnes AI
Sapiens AI's (Singapore) full-modality AI platform. Free Access tier: use frontier models for free. Text (Agnes 2.0 Flash, Claw-Eval #9 globally), Image (Agnes Image 2.0 Flash), Video (Agnes Video V2.0). Basic TPS limit, fair-use quota. Paid Token Plan for higher TPS and quotas.γ
Pros
- βText/image/video all free
- βText model Claw-Eval #9 globally
- βImage pricing was 1/10 of industry
- βFair-use, no hard cap
- βNo credit card needed
- βMulti-model cluster + smart routing lowers cost
Cons
- βBasic TPS limit, slower speed
- βNew platform, stability TBD
- βFree tier has no priority support
- βModel ecosystem smaller than OpenAI/Anthropic
Key Features
Text/image/video full modality APIAgnes 2.0 Flash text modelAgnes Image generationAgnes Video generationMulti-model cluster smart routingEnterprise: SSO and team analytics
Groq
Groq uses custom LPU chips for inference, delivering speeds several times faster than standard GPUs. Free tier offers 1000 requests/day with Llama, Qwen, and other open-source models. If you need real-time response speed for chat or streaming, Groq is currently the fastest free inference service available.γ
Pros
- βExtremely fast inference with custom LPU hardware
- βGenerous free tier: 1000 requests/day
- βSupports popular open-source models (Llama, Qwen, etc.)
- βOpenAI-compatible API format
Cons
- βRequires VPN from China
- βOnly open-source models, no GPT/Claude
- βFree tier has concurrency and TPM limits
Key Features
LPU Hardware Inference17 Free ModelsOpenAI-Compatible APIStreaming OutputWhisper Speech-to-Text