AtomCode vs Cursor
Compare AtomCode and Cursor: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
Coding Assistant
Coding Assistant
Rating
β 4.5
β 3.5
Free Credits
30 days
0 undefined
Refresh Period
one-time
one-time
Resolution
N/A
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
No
Paid From
CodingPlan free, API separate
$20/month
AtomCode
Huawei-backed open-source terminal AI coding assistant, competing with Claude Code. CodingPlan offers free 30-day access to GLM-4.6, DeepSeek-V4-Flash, Qwen3 series and more, running on Ascend chips with 5-hour rolling window metering.γ
Pros
- βPro tier free with GLM-4.6 top-tier model
- βRich model lineup covering top Chinese open-source LLMs
- βStrong Agent capabilities, not just API wrapper
- βNo VPN needed, WeChat login
- βAscend chip deployment, low compute cost
Cons
- βLimited daily free quotas, need to grab early
- βClient-only, no third-party API access
- β30-day validity, no renewal mechanism
- βWeChat login only, no other login options
Key Features
GLM-4.6 #1 open-source coding model (Artificial Analysis benchmark)Pro tier: GLM-4.6, DeepSeek-V4-Flash, Qwen3 seriesLite tier: DeepSeek-V4-Flash, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, MiniMax-M2.7Smart Agent loop: auto read, edit, run, search, verify8 built-in code tools: symbol indexing, call chain trackingSafe rollback: /undo one-click revert5-hour rolling window meteringRuns on Huawei Ascend chips, no VPN needed
Cursor
AI coding IDE, #1 market share at 31%. Free Hobby plan with no credit card required. Pro at $20/mo supports GPT-4o, Claude and more.γ
Pros
- βLargest market share, most community resources
- βNo credit card needed
- βStrong Agent capabilities
- βMost models supported
Cons
- βFree tier limits are vague
- β$20/mo not cheap
- βVSCode-based, heavy
Key Features
AI Agent modeTab smart completionCode chatMulti-model (GPT-4o/Claude/Gemini)Cloud AgentsMCPs extensions