Claude vs Huawei DevEco Code
Compare Claude and Huawei DevEco Code: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
LLM
Coding Assistant
Rating
β 4.5
β 4
Free Credits
4.8 available free domestically via specific channels
999999 unlimited
Refresh Period
daily
unlimited
Resolution
N/A
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
Yes
Yes
Paid From
$20/month
Free
Claude
By Anthropic, known for safety and long-context processing. Free tier has daily message limits. Pro users access Claude Code for terminal-based coding. Top coding performance across multiple benchmarks.
Pros
- β200K context window, longest in class
- βTop coding performance in benchmarks
- βClear logic, fewer hallucinations
- βClaude Code CLI coding experience is excellent
- βFree Sonnet is sufficient for daily use
Cons
- βLimited daily uses on free tier
- βOpus and extended thinking require Pro
- βRequires VPN in some regions
- βNo image generation capability
Key Features
200K Long ContextClaude Code CLIExtended ThinkingArtifacts PreviewProjects ManagementFile Upload AnalysisMultilingual Chat
Huawei DevEco Code
Huawei CLI coding assistant with built-in Zhipu GLM-5.1 model, ready to use after login with no manual selection needed. Completely free with no usage limits, trained on Huawei Ascend chips, coding capability reaches 94.6% of Claude Opus 4.6. Rich theme options with dark/light mode switching, great looking interface.
Pros
- βCompletely free with no limits, no queuing
- βGLM-5.1 coding capability near Claude Opus
- βnpm install, 3 minutes to start
- βBased on Huawei Ascend chips, domestic autonomous
- βNot tied to HarmonyOS development, works for general coding
Cons
- βStandalone CLI tool, cannot integrate with Cursor/Claude Code
- βCurrently positioned as HarmonyOS development assistant
- βModel capability not as strong as Claude Opus/GPT-4o
Key Features
Built-in GLM-5.1 free modelUnlimited usage, no limitsnpm global installHuawei account loginTerminal interface