Cursor vs Agnes AI
Compare Cursor and Agnes AI: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
Coding Assistant
LLM
Rating
β 3.5
β 4
Free Credits
0 undefined
0 undefined
Refresh Period
one-time
unlimited
Resolution
N/A
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
Yes
Paid From
$20/month
Token Plan (monthly/yearly, higher TPS and quotas)
Cursor
AI coding IDE, #1 market share at 31%. Free Hobby plan with no credit card required. Pro at $20/mo supports GPT-4o, Claude and more.
Pros
- βLargest market share, most community resources
- βNo credit card needed
- βStrong Agent capabilities
- βMost models supported
Cons
- βFree tier limits are vague
- β$20/mo not cheap
- βVSCode-based, heavy
Key Features
AI Agent modeTab smart completionCode chatMulti-model (GPT-4o/Claude/Gemini)Cloud AgentsMCPs extensions
Agnes AI
Sapiens AI's (Singapore) full-modality AI platform. Free Access tier: use frontier models for free. Text (Agnes 2.0 Flash, Claw-Eval #9 globally), Image (Agnes Image 2.0 Flash), Video (Agnes Video V2.0). Basic TPS limit, fair-use quota. Paid Token Plan for higher TPS and quotas.
Pros
- βText/image/video all free
- βText model Claw-Eval #9 globally
- βImage pricing was 1/10 of industry
- βFair-use, no hard cap
- βNo credit card needed
- βMulti-model cluster + smart routing lowers cost
Cons
- βBasic TPS limit, slower speed
- βNew platform, stability TBD
- βFree tier has no priority support
- βModel ecosystem smaller than OpenAI/Anthropic
Key Features
Text/image/video full modality APIAgnes 2.0 Flash text modelAgnes Image generationAgnes Video generationMulti-model cluster smart routingEnterprise: SSO and team analytics