Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
Compare Cursor and GitHub Copilot: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
Coding Assistant
Coding Assistant
Rating
β 3.5
β 4.5
Free Credits
0 undefined
2000 completions/month (free tier)
Refresh Period
one-time
monthly
Resolution
N/A
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
Yes
Paid From
$20/month
$10/month
Cursor
AI coding IDE, #1 market share at 31%. Free Hobby plan with no credit card required. Pro at $20/mo supports GPT-4o, Claude and more.
Pros
- βLargest market share, most community resources
- βNo credit card needed
- βStrong Agent capabilities
- βMost models supported
Cons
- βFree tier limits are vague
- β$20/mo not cheap
- βVSCode-based, heavy
Key Features
AI Agent modeTab smart completionCode chatMulti-model (GPT-4o/Claude/Gemini)Cloud AgentsMCPs extensions
GitHub Copilot
Microsoft's AI coding assistant, deeply integrated with VS Code and GitHub. Code completion, Chat, and Agent mode. Free for students and OSS maintainers, $10/month for individuals.
Pros
- βDeep VS Code integration, smooth experience
- βFree Pro for students and OSS maintainers
- βSupports both GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet
- βIndustry-leading completion accuracy
- βSeamless GitHub ecosystem integration
Cons
- βFree tier limited to 2000 completions/month
- βAgent mode only in Pro ($10/month)
- βSuggestions can be verbose sometimes
Key Features
Code Auto-CompletionChat ModeAgent Autonomous CodingMulti-File EditingTerminal Command GenerationPR Summary GenerationCode Review Suggestions