Cursor vs Huawei DevEco Code
Compare Cursor and Huawei DevEco Code: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
Coding Assistant
Coding Assistant
Rating
β 3.5
β 4
Free Credits
0 undefined
999999 unlimited
Refresh Period
one-time
unlimited
Resolution
N/A
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
Yes
Paid From
$20/month
Free
Cursor
AI coding IDE, #1 market share at 31%. Free Hobby plan with no credit card required. Pro at $20/mo supports GPT-4o, Claude and more.
Pros
- βLargest market share, most community resources
- βNo credit card needed
- βStrong Agent capabilities
- βMost models supported
Cons
- βFree tier limits are vague
- β$20/mo not cheap
- βVSCode-based, heavy
Key Features
AI Agent modeTab smart completionCode chatMulti-model (GPT-4o/Claude/Gemini)Cloud AgentsMCPs extensions
Huawei DevEco Code
Huawei CLI coding assistant with built-in Zhipu GLM-5.1 model, ready to use after login with no manual selection needed. Completely free with no usage limits, trained on Huawei Ascend chips, coding capability reaches 94.6% of Claude Opus 4.6. Rich theme options with dark/light mode switching, great looking interface.
Pros
- βCompletely free with no limits, no queuing
- βGLM-5.1 coding capability near Claude Opus
- βnpm install, 3 minutes to start
- βBased on Huawei Ascend chips, domestic autonomous
- βNot tied to HarmonyOS development, works for general coding
Cons
- βStandalone CLI tool, cannot integrate with Cursor/Claude Code
- βCurrently positioned as HarmonyOS development assistant
- βModel capability not as strong as Claude Opus/GPT-4o
Key Features
Built-in GLM-5.1 free modelUnlimited usage, no limitsnpm global installHuawei account loginTerminal interface