Cursor vs SiliconFlow
Compare Cursor and SiliconFlow: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
Coding Assistant
API Platform
Rating
β 3.5
β 3.5
Free Credits
0 undefined
null RPM 500, TPM 2,000,000
Refresh Period
one-time
per-minute
Resolution
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
Yes
Paid From
$20/month
From Β₯0.006/1K tokens
Cursor
AI coding IDE, #1 market share at 31%. Free Hobby plan with no credit card required. Pro at $20/mo supports GPT-4o, Claude and more.
Pros
- βLargest market share, most community resources
- βNo credit card needed
- βStrong Agent capabilities
- βMost models supported
Cons
- βFree tier limits are vague
- β$20/mo not cheap
- βVSCode-based, heavy
Key Features
AI Agent modeTab smart completionCode chatMulti-model (GPT-4o/Claude/Gemini)Cloud AgentsMCPs extensions
SiliconFlow
Chinese API aggregation platform unifying open-source models under one interface. Free tier: RPM 500, TPM 2M, supporting DeepSeek, Qwen, GLM and more. Saves the trouble of self-hosting open-source models, with fast domestic access.
Pros
- βAccessible from China without VPN
- βHigh concurrency: RPM 500
- βFree models include GLM-Z1-9B and more
- βUnified interface for easy model switching
Cons
- βLimited number of free models
- βSome models require payment
- βRegistration needed for API token
Key Features
RPM 500TPM 2MChina Direct AccessOpenAI-Compatible APIUnified Multi-Model Interface