DeepSeek vs Groq

Compare DeepSeek and Groq: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?

Feature
Category
LLM
API Platform
Rating
⭐ 3.5
⭐ 5
Free Credits
0 undefined
1000 requests/day
Refresh Period
one-time
daily
Resolution
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
Yes
Paid From
API $0.14/million tokens
Pay-as-you-go

DeepSeek

DeepSeek's flagship model, the cost-performance king of Chinese AI. V4 is free to use, API pricing is 1/10th of GPT-4o. Excellent at coding and math, competitive with closed-source models in benchmarks.

Pros

  • βœ“Excellent value
  • βœ“Strong reasoning
  • βœ“Open source for local deployment
  • βœ“Cheap API

Cons

  • βœ—May queue during peak hours
  • βœ—Not as creative as GPT

Key Features

DeepSeek-V4 free to useDeepSeek-R1 reasoning model200K long contextMulti-language coding supportTop-tier math reasoningWeb search capability
View Details β†’

Groq

Groq uses custom LPU chips for inference, delivering speeds several times faster than standard GPUs. Free tier offers 1000 requests/day with Llama, Qwen, and other open-source models. If you need real-time response speed for chat or streaming, Groq is currently the fastest free inference service available.

Pros

  • βœ“Extremely fast inference with custom LPU hardware
  • βœ“Generous free tier: 1000 requests/day
  • βœ“Supports popular open-source models (Llama, Qwen, etc.)
  • βœ“OpenAI-compatible API format

Cons

  • βœ—Requires VPN from China
  • βœ—Only open-source models, no GPT/Claude
  • βœ—Free tier has concurrency and TPM limits

Key Features

LPU Hardware Inference17 Free ModelsOpenAI-Compatible APIStreaming OutputWhisper Speech-to-Text
View Details β†’