DeepSeek vs Kimi
Compare DeepSeek and Kimi: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
LLM
LLM
Rating
β 3.5
β 3.5
Free Credits
0 undefined
0 undefined
Refresh Period
one-time
daily
Resolution
N/A
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
No
Paid From
API $0.14/million tokens
API $0.12/million tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek's flagship model, the cost-performance king of Chinese AI. V4 is free to use, API pricing is 1/10th of GPT-4o. Excellent at coding and math, competitive with closed-source models in benchmarks.
Pros
- βExcellent value
- βStrong reasoning
- βOpen source for local deployment
- βCheap API
Cons
- βMay queue during peak hours
- βNot as creative as GPT
Key Features
DeepSeek-V4 free to useDeepSeek-R1 reasoning model200K long contextMulti-language coding supportTop-tier math reasoningWeb search capability
Kimi
By Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 focuses on coding and agent capabilities. 13-hour non-stop coding, 300 sub-agents in parallel, SWE-Bench Pro score of 58.6. Free tier includes daily credits for chat and light coding tasks.
Pros
- βK2.6 coding performance near Claude Sonnet
- βOpen-weight model, self-hostable
- βFree credits daily
- βMassive 2M context window
- βAgent Swarm for parallel tasks
- βAccessible in China without VPN
Cons
- βFree tier limited, heavy use requires payment
- βK2-Thinking mode is slow
- βComplex reasoning below top closed-source models
- βAPI pricing adds up for heavy use
Key Features
K2.6 coding + agent modelAgent Swarm: 300 parallel sub-agents13-hour non-stop coding2M character context windowWeb search with real-time infoKimi Code coding assistantKimi Claw AI agentDeep Research modeSlides/Websites/Docs/Sheets generation