DeepSeek vs Tabbit
Compare DeepSeek and Tabbit: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
LLM
AI Assistant
Rating
β 3.5
β 3.5
Free Credits
0 undefined
1000 chats/week + 50 images + 10 Agent tasks
Refresh Period
one-time
daily
Resolution
N/A
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
Yes
Paid From
API $0.14/million tokens
N/A
DeepSeek
DeepSeek's flagship model, the cost-performance king of Chinese AI. V4 is free to use, API pricing is 1/10th of GPT-4o. Excellent at coding and math, competitive with closed-source models in benchmarks.
Pros
- βExcellent value
- βStrong reasoning
- βOpen source for local deployment
- βCheap API
Cons
- βMay queue during peak hours
- βNot as creative as GPT
Key Features
DeepSeek-V4 free to useDeepSeek-R1 reasoning model200K long contextMulti-language coding supportTop-tier math reasoningWeb search capability
Tabbit
An AI browser built from the ground up by Meituan's Light Years team β not a Chrome extension with a sidebar, but AI woven into every layer. Chat with AI while browsing, referencing pages, screenshots, or local files. Built-in Agent automates repetitive tasks like form filling and data collection. Create custom Skills for your workflows. Standard version is free forever with ~1000 AI chats/week, 50 images, and 10 Agent tasks.
Pros
- βStandard version is free forever with generous limits
- βAI is deeply integrated, not just a sidebar
- βBuilt-in Agent automates repetitive tasks
- βCustom Skills let you build personalized workflows
- βSupports GPT-5.2, Claude-Sonnet-4.6, and other top models
Cons
- βJust launched β ecosystem still maturing
- βDesktop only, no mobile app yet
- βAgent capabilities are still basic
Key Features
AI chat while browsing (reference pages/screenshots/files)Built-in Agent for task automationCustom Skills for personalized workflowsSmart tab groupingMulti-model switching (GPT-5.2, Claude, etc.)