Freebuff vs Adobe Firefly

Compare Freebuff and Adobe Firefly: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?

Category
Coding Assistant
Image Generation
Rating
⭐ 3.5
⭐ 3.5
Free Credits
0 undefined
25 credits/month
Refresh Period
unlimited
daily
Resolution
N/A
ζœ€ι«˜2048x2048
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
Yes
Paid From
Codebuff from $100/mo
Free (25 credits/month)

Freebuff

Free AI coding agent that edits code via natural language in terminal. Based on paid Codebuff, ad-supported. Uses DeepSeek V4 Flash by default, supports Kimi K2.6, MiniMax M2.7 and other models.

Pros

  • βœ“Completely free, ads for credits
  • βœ“No config needed, works out of box
  • βœ“Supports multiple domestic models
  • βœ“Built-in code review and browser use
  • βœ“Open source MIT license

Cons

  • βœ—Ads in terminal
  • βœ—DeepSeek V4 Pro trains on data
  • βœ—Not available in all countries
  • βœ—Requires internet, no offline use

Key Features

Natural language coding in terminal9 built-in sub-agentsDeepSeek V4 FlashCode reviewBrowser useDeep thinkingOpen source MIT license
View Details β†’

Adobe Firefly

Adobe's AI painting tool, safest for commercial use. 25 free credits/month, commercially safe images.

Pros

  • βœ“Zero commercial risk
  • βœ“Adobe quality guarantee
  • βœ“Seamless Photoshop integration
  • βœ“Fine quality

Cons

  • βœ—Only 25 credits/month
  • βœ—Requires VPN for China
  • βœ—Less creative flexibility than SD

Key Features

Text to ImageImage to ImageGenerative FillStyle ReferencePhotoshop integration
View Details β†’