Freebuff vs bb-browser
Compare Freebuff and bb-browser: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
Coding Assistant
Coding Assistant
Rating
β 3.5
β 4
Free Credits
0 undefined
999999 unlimited
Refresh Period
unlimited
unlimited
Resolution
N/A
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
Yes
Paid From
Codebuff from $100/mo
Completely free
Freebuff
Free AI coding agent that edits code via natural language in terminal. Based on paid Codebuff, ad-supported. Uses DeepSeek V4 Flash by default, supports Kimi K2.6, MiniMax M2.7 and other models.
Pros
- βCompletely free, ads for credits
- βNo config needed, works out of box
- βSupports multiple domestic models
- βBuilt-in code review and browser use
- βOpen source MIT license
Cons
- βAds in terminal
- βDeepSeek V4 Pro trains on data
- βNot available in all countries
- βRequires internet, no offline use
Key Features
Natural language coding in terminal9 built-in sub-agentsDeepSeek V4 FlashCode reviewBrowser useDeep thinkingOpen source MIT license
bb-browser
Open-source tool: "Your browser is the API." CLI + MCP server for AI agents to control Chrome with your login state. No separate API keys needed β reuses your existing browser sessions. Perfect for developers who need AI to automate web tasks.
Pros
- βFree and open source (MIT)
- βReuses browser login state, no extra config
- βSupports CLI and MCP Server modes
- βEnables AI agents to operate real web pages
Cons
- βRequires local Chrome
- βDepends on Node.js
- βRelatively new project, ecosystem still growing
Key Features
CLI toolMCP Server integrationChrome browser controlLogin state reuseAI Agent automation