Freebuff vs GitHub Models
Compare Freebuff and GitHub Models: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
Coding Assistant
API Platform
Rating
β 3.5
β 3.5
Free Credits
0 undefined
150 requests/day
Refresh Period
unlimited
daily
Resolution
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
No
Paid From
Codebuff from $100/mo
Freebuff
Free AI coding agent that edits code via natural language in terminal. Based on paid Codebuff, ad-supported. Uses DeepSeek V4 Flash by default, supports Kimi K2.6, MiniMax M2.7 and other models.
Pros
- βCompletely free, ads for credits
- βNo config needed, works out of box
- βSupports multiple domestic models
- βBuilt-in code review and browser use
- βOpen source MIT license
Cons
- βAds in terminal
- βDeepSeek V4 Pro trains on data
- βNot available in all countries
- βRequires internet, no offline use
Key Features
Natural language coding in terminal9 built-in sub-agentsDeepSeek V4 FlashCode reviewBrowser useDeep thinkingOpen source MIT license
GitHub Models
GitHub's free AI model inference service, accessible with just a GitHub account. Supports GPT-4.1, GPT-4o and other OpenAI models for free β the lowest barrier to entry for GPT-series models.
Pros
- βFree access to GPT-4.1 and GPT-4o
- βOnly GitHub account needed, no credit card
- βMicrosoft-backed stability
- βCode generation and multimodal support
Cons
- βOnly 150 requests per day
- β15 RPM rate limit
- βNot suitable for high-frequency use
Key Features
Free GPT-4.1/4oGitHub Account LoginCode Model SupportPlayground Experience