Freebuff vs Google Jules
Compare Freebuff and Google Jules: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
Coding Assistant
Coding Assistant
Rating
β 3.5
β 3
Free Credits
0 undefined
60 undefined
Refresh Period
unlimited
unlimited
Resolution
N/A
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
Yes
Paid From
Codebuff from $100/mo
N/A
Freebuff
Free AI coding agent that edits code via natural language in terminal. Based on paid Codebuff, ad-supported. Uses DeepSeek V4 Flash by default, supports Kimi K2.6, MiniMax M2.7 and other models.
Pros
- βCompletely free, ads for credits
- βNo config needed, works out of box
- βSupports multiple domestic models
- βBuilt-in code review and browser use
- βOpen source MIT license
Cons
- βAds in terminal
- βDeepSeek V4 Pro trains on data
- βNot available in all countries
- βRequires internet, no offline use
Key Features
Natural language coding in terminal9 built-in sub-agentsDeepSeek V4 FlashCode reviewBrowser useDeep thinkingOpen source MIT license
Google Jules
Google's free AI coding tool. Version 1.5 major upgrade: 60x limit increase, 10x speed boost. Completely free, supports code generation, debugging, refactoring. A free alternative to GitHub Copilot.
Pros
- βCompletely free
- βGoogle quality
- βDramatically increased limits
- βFast speed
Cons
- βRequires Google account
- βMay need VPN in China
Key Features
Code GenerationDebuggingRefactoringMulti-language Support