Freebuff vs Groq
Compare Freebuff and Groq: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
Coding Assistant
API Platform
Rating
β 3.5
β 5
Free Credits
0 undefined
1000 requests/day
Refresh Period
unlimited
daily
Resolution
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
Yes
Paid From
Codebuff from $100/mo
Pay-as-you-go
Freebuff
Free AI coding agent that edits code via natural language in terminal. Based on paid Codebuff, ad-supported. Uses DeepSeek V4 Flash by default, supports Kimi K2.6, MiniMax M2.7 and other models.
Pros
- βCompletely free, ads for credits
- βNo config needed, works out of box
- βSupports multiple domestic models
- βBuilt-in code review and browser use
- βOpen source MIT license
Cons
- βAds in terminal
- βDeepSeek V4 Pro trains on data
- βNot available in all countries
- βRequires internet, no offline use
Key Features
Natural language coding in terminal9 built-in sub-agentsDeepSeek V4 FlashCode reviewBrowser useDeep thinkingOpen source MIT license
Groq
Groq uses custom LPU chips for inference, delivering speeds several times faster than standard GPUs. Free tier offers 1000 requests/day with Llama, Qwen, and other open-source models. If you need real-time response speed for chat or streaming, Groq is currently the fastest free inference service available.
Pros
- βExtremely fast inference with custom LPU hardware
- βGenerous free tier: 1000 requests/day
- βSupports popular open-source models (Llama, Qwen, etc.)
- βOpenAI-compatible API format
Cons
- βRequires VPN from China
- βOnly open-source models, no GPT/Claude
- βFree tier has concurrency and TPM limits
Key Features
LPU Hardware Inference17 Free ModelsOpenAI-Compatible APIStreaming OutputWhisper Speech-to-Text