Groq vs Cohere

Compare Groq and Cohere: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?

Feature
Category
API Platform
API Platform
Rating
⭐ 5
⭐ 3
Free Credits
1000 requests/day
null 20 RPM
Refresh Period
daily
per-minute
Resolution
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
Yes
No
Paid From
Pay-as-you-go
Pay-as-you-go

Groq

Groq uses custom LPU chips for inference, delivering speeds several times faster than standard GPUs. Free tier offers 1000 requests/day with Llama, Qwen, and other open-source models. If you need real-time response speed for chat or streaming, Groq is currently the fastest free inference service available.

Pros

  • βœ“Extremely fast inference with custom LPU hardware
  • βœ“Generous free tier: 1000 requests/day
  • βœ“Supports popular open-source models (Llama, Qwen, etc.)
  • βœ“OpenAI-compatible API format

Cons

  • βœ—Requires VPN from China
  • βœ—Only open-source models, no GPT/Claude
  • βœ—Free tier has concurrency and TPM limits

Key Features

LPU Hardware Inference17 Free ModelsOpenAI-Compatible APIStreaming OutputWhisper Speech-to-Text
View Details β†’

Cohere

Enterprise AI platform with 20 RPM free tier. Command models excel in enterprise document processing, RAG, and search scenarios. Ideal for building enterprise AI applications.

Pros

  • βœ“Enterprise-grade stability
  • βœ“Command models excel at RAG
  • βœ“High-quality embedding models

Cons

  • βœ—20 RPM is relatively low
  • βœ—Requires VPN from China
  • βœ—Primarily targets enterprise users

Key Features

Command Model SeriesEmbedding ModelsRAG SupportEnterprise API
View Details β†’