Groq vs InternLM
Compare Groq and InternLM: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
API Platform
API Platform
Rating
β 5
β 3
Free Credits
1000 requests/day
null 10 RPM, key valid 6 months
Refresh Period
daily
per-minute
Resolution
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
Yes
No
Paid From
Pay-as-you-go
Groq
Groq uses custom LPU chips for inference, delivering speeds several times faster than standard GPUs. Free tier offers 1000 requests/day with Llama, Qwen, and other open-source models. If you need real-time response speed for chat or streaming, Groq is currently the fastest free inference service available.
Pros
- βExtremely fast inference with custom LPU hardware
- βGenerous free tier: 1000 requests/day
- βSupports popular open-source models (Llama, Qwen, etc.)
- βOpenAI-compatible API format
Cons
- βRequires VPN from China
- βOnly open-source models, no GPT/Claude
- βFree tier has concurrency and TPM limits
Key Features
LPU Hardware Inference17 Free ModelsOpenAI-Compatible APIStreaming OutputWhisper Speech-to-Text
InternLM
InternLM API from Shanghai AI Lab. Free tier: 10 RPM, API key valid for 6 months. InternVL3-78B is a multimodal model with strong image-text understanding. Domestic access, solid academic background.
Pros
- βAccessible from China without VPN
- βSolid academic backing from Shanghai AI Lab
- βInternVL3 has strong multimodal capabilities
- βCompletely free
Cons
- β10 RPM is very low
- βAPI key expires after 6 months
- βLimited model selection
Key Features
InternVL3-78B MultimodalChina Direct AccessFree to Use