Kimi vs Agnes AI
Compare Kimi and Agnes AI: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
LLM
LLM
Rating
β 3.5
β 4
Free Credits
0 undefined
0 undefined
Refresh Period
daily
unlimited
Resolution
N/A
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
Yes
Paid From
API $0.12/million tokens
Token Plan (monthly/yearly, higher TPS and quotas)
Kimi
By Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 focuses on coding and agent capabilities. 13-hour non-stop coding, 300 sub-agents in parallel, SWE-Bench Pro score of 58.6. Free tier includes daily credits for chat and light coding tasks.
Pros
- βK2.6 coding performance near Claude Sonnet
- βOpen-weight model, self-hostable
- βFree credits daily
- βMassive 2M context window
- βAgent Swarm for parallel tasks
- βAccessible in China without VPN
Cons
- βFree tier limited, heavy use requires payment
- βK2-Thinking mode is slow
- βComplex reasoning below top closed-source models
- βAPI pricing adds up for heavy use
Key Features
K2.6 coding + agent modelAgent Swarm: 300 parallel sub-agents13-hour non-stop coding2M character context windowWeb search with real-time infoKimi Code coding assistantKimi Claw AI agentDeep Research modeSlides/Websites/Docs/Sheets generation
Agnes AI
Sapiens AI's (Singapore) full-modality AI platform. Free Access tier: use frontier models for free. Text (Agnes 2.0 Flash, Claw-Eval #9 globally), Image (Agnes Image 2.0 Flash), Video (Agnes Video V2.0). Basic TPS limit, fair-use quota. Paid Token Plan for higher TPS and quotas.
Pros
- βText/image/video all free
- βText model Claw-Eval #9 globally
- βImage pricing was 1/10 of industry
- βFair-use, no hard cap
- βNo credit card needed
- βMulti-model cluster + smart routing lowers cost
Cons
- βBasic TPS limit, slower speed
- βNew platform, stability TBD
- βFree tier has no priority support
- βModel ecosystem smaller than OpenAI/Anthropic
Key Features
Text/image/video full modality APIAgnes 2.0 Flash text modelAgnes Image generationAgnes Video generationMulti-model cluster smart routingEnterprise: SSO and team analytics