Kimi vs SiliconFlow
Compare Kimi and SiliconFlow: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
LLM
API Platform
Rating
β 3.5
β 3.5
Free Credits
0 undefined
null RPM 500, TPM 2,000,000
Refresh Period
daily
per-minute
Resolution
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
Yes
Paid From
API $0.12/million tokens
From Β₯0.006/1K tokens
Kimi
By Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 focuses on coding and agent capabilities. 13-hour non-stop coding, 300 sub-agents in parallel, SWE-Bench Pro score of 58.6. Free tier includes daily credits for chat and light coding tasks.
Pros
- βK2.6 coding performance near Claude Sonnet
- βOpen-weight model, self-hostable
- βFree credits daily
- βMassive 2M context window
- βAgent Swarm for parallel tasks
- βAccessible in China without VPN
Cons
- βFree tier limited, heavy use requires payment
- βK2-Thinking mode is slow
- βComplex reasoning below top closed-source models
- βAPI pricing adds up for heavy use
Key Features
K2.6 coding + agent modelAgent Swarm: 300 parallel sub-agents13-hour non-stop coding2M character context windowWeb search with real-time infoKimi Code coding assistantKimi Claw AI agentDeep Research modeSlides/Websites/Docs/Sheets generation
SiliconFlow
Chinese API aggregation platform unifying open-source models under one interface. Free tier: RPM 500, TPM 2M, supporting DeepSeek, Qwen, GLM and more. Saves the trouble of self-hosting open-source models, with fast domestic access.
Pros
- βAccessible from China without VPN
- βHigh concurrency: RPM 500
- βFree models include GLM-Z1-9B and more
- βUnified interface for easy model switching
Cons
- βLimited number of free models
- βSome models require payment
- βRegistration needed for API token
Key Features
RPM 500TPM 2MChina Direct AccessOpenAI-Compatible APIUnified Multi-Model Interface