Kimi vs iFlytek Spark MaaS
Compare Kimi and iFlytek Spark MaaS: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
LLM
LLM
Rating
β 3.5
β 3
Free Credits
0 undefined
6 undefined
Refresh Period
daily
one-time
Resolution
N/A
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
No
Paid From
API $0.12/million tokens
Token Plan subscription
Kimi
By Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 focuses on coding and agent capabilities. 13-hour non-stop coding, 300 sub-agents in parallel, SWE-Bench Pro score of 58.6. Free tier includes daily credits for chat and light coding tasks.
Pros
- βK2.6 coding performance near Claude Sonnet
- βOpen-weight model, self-hostable
- βFree credits daily
- βMassive 2M context window
- βAgent Swarm for parallel tasks
- βAccessible in China without VPN
Cons
- βFree tier limited, heavy use requires payment
- βK2-Thinking mode is slow
- βComplex reasoning below top closed-source models
- βAPI pricing adds up for heavy use
Key Features
K2.6 coding + agent modelAgent Swarm: 300 parallel sub-agents13-hour non-stop coding2M character context windowWeb search with real-time infoKimi Code coding assistantKimi Claw AI agentDeep Research modeSlides/Websites/Docs/Sheets generation
iFlytek Spark MaaS
iFlytek's one-stop LLM platform aggregating Spark, DeepSeek, Qwen models. Currently offering free unlimited access to Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B until end of June. Supports API calls via CC Switch for Claude Code, Codex integration.
Pros
- βCompletely free with unlimited tokens during promo
- βQwen3.6 is powerful despite 35B parameters
- β128K context window supported
- βIntegrates with Claude Code/Codex via CC Switch
- βPlatform aggregates multiple mainstream models
Cons
- βFree promo ends end of June
- βRequires CC Switch configuration
- βNot compatible with latest Claude Code version yet
Key Features
Free Qwen3.6/3.5-35B API accessAnthropic-compatible API formatCC Switch visual configurationSupports Claude Code/Codex/OpenClaw128K context window