Kimi vs Zhipu CogView
Compare Kimi and Zhipu CogView: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
LLM
Image Generation
Rating
β 3.5
β 3
Free Credits
0 undefined
100 100 credits
Refresh Period
daily
daily
Resolution
N/A
1024x1024
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
Yes
Paid From
API $0.12/million tokens
Free
Kimi
By Moonshot AI, Kimi K2.6 focuses on coding and agent capabilities. 13-hour non-stop coding, 300 sub-agents in parallel, SWE-Bench Pro score of 58.6. Free tier includes daily credits for chat and light coding tasks.
Pros
- βK2.6 coding performance near Claude Sonnet
- βOpen-weight model, self-hostable
- βFree credits daily
- βMassive 2M context window
- βAgent Swarm for parallel tasks
- βAccessible in China without VPN
Cons
- βFree tier limited, heavy use requires payment
- βK2-Thinking mode is slow
- βComplex reasoning below top closed-source models
- βAPI pricing adds up for heavy use
Key Features
K2.6 coding + agent modelAgent Swarm: 300 parallel sub-agents13-hour non-stop coding2M character context windowWeb search with real-time infoKimi Code coding assistantKimi Claw AI agentDeep Research modeSlides/Websites/Docs/Sheets generation
Zhipu CogView
Zhipu AI's image generation model, available directly in ChatGLM. Free daily credits, strong Chinese prompt understanding.
Pros
- βBest Chinese prompt understanding
- βNo separate registration
- βUse directly in ChatGLM
- βFree
Cons
- βQuality below professional tools
- βRelatively simple features
- βLimited resolution
Key Features
Text to ImageDirect use in ChatGLMStrong Chinese understandingMultiple stylesFree to use