Lovart vs Zhipu GLM Coding Plan
Compare Lovart and Zhipu GLM Coding Plan: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
Image Generation
Coding Assistant
Rating
β 3
β 3.5
Free Credits
0 undefined
4.7 undefined
Refresh Period
unlimited
unlimited
Resolution
4K
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
Yes
Paid From
N/A
Lite $30/quarter (~$10/mo)
Lovart
AI design platform integrating NanoPro, NanoBanana 2 and other image generation models. No watermark, unlimited free use, 4K direct output. One of the most comprehensive free AI design platforms.γ
Pros
- βNo watermark
- βUnlimited free
- β4K output
- βMultiple models
Cons
- βPlatform is new, stability TBD
Key Features
AI Image Generation4K OutputMulti-model SwitchingDesign Tools
Zhipu GLM Coding Plan
Zhipu's AI coding subscription paired with ZCode IDE. Free models available (GLM-4.7-Flash, GLM-4.5-Flash). Paid tiers: Lite ~$10/mo, Pro ~$30/mo, Max ~$80/mo (quarterly billing). Compatible with 20+ coding tools. Subscribers get 1.5x quota in ZCode.γ
Pros
- βFree models truly unlimited
- βGLM-4.6 flagship coding model
- βWorks with 20+ coding tools (Claude Code/Cursor/Cline etc)
- βFree MCP tools with subscription (vision/search/reader)
- β1.5x quota for subscribers in ZCode
- βEasy payment via Alipay in China
Cons
- βQuarterly billing only, no monthly
- βFlash models lack depth for complex tasks
- βGLM-4 requires Pro tier
- βPrices increased 30%+, no first-purchase discount
Key Features
Unlimited free Flash modelsZCode 3.0 coding tool (self-developed Agent)Multi-model: GLM-4.6/5-Turbo/4.7/4.6OpenAI/Claude API compatibleFree vision/search/reader MCP toolsWorks with Claude Code/Cursor/Cline/Codex CLI and 20+ tools