iFlytek Spark MaaS vs Groq
Compare iFlytek Spark MaaS and Groq: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
LLM
API Platform
Rating
β 3
β 5
Free Credits
6 undefined
1000 requests/day
Refresh Period
one-time
daily
Resolution
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
Yes
Paid From
Token Plan subscription
Pay-as-you-go
iFlytek Spark MaaS
iFlytek's one-stop LLM platform aggregating Spark, DeepSeek, Qwen models. Currently offering free unlimited access to Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B until end of June. Supports API calls via CC Switch for Claude Code, Codex integration.
Pros
- βCompletely free with unlimited tokens during promo
- βQwen3.6 is powerful despite 35B parameters
- β128K context window supported
- βIntegrates with Claude Code/Codex via CC Switch
- βPlatform aggregates multiple mainstream models
Cons
- βFree promo ends end of June
- βRequires CC Switch configuration
- βNot compatible with latest Claude Code version yet
Key Features
Free Qwen3.6/3.5-35B API accessAnthropic-compatible API formatCC Switch visual configurationSupports Claude Code/Codex/OpenClaw128K context window
Groq
Groq uses custom LPU chips for inference, delivering speeds several times faster than standard GPUs. Free tier offers 1000 requests/day with Llama, Qwen, and other open-source models. If you need real-time response speed for chat or streaming, Groq is currently the fastest free inference service available.
Pros
- βExtremely fast inference with custom LPU hardware
- βGenerous free tier: 1000 requests/day
- βSupports popular open-source models (Llama, Qwen, etc.)
- βOpenAI-compatible API format
Cons
- βRequires VPN from China
- βOnly open-source models, no GPT/Claude
- βFree tier has concurrency and TPM limits
Key Features
LPU Hardware Inference17 Free ModelsOpenAI-Compatible APIStreaming OutputWhisper Speech-to-Text