Xiaomi MiMo Code vs Agnes AI
Compare Xiaomi MiMo Code and Agnes AI: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Xiaomi MiMo Code
Xiaomi's AI coding agent forked from OpenCode, open-sourced under MIT. The killer feature is the built-in MiMo Auto channel β zero config, free for 1 month, runs MiMo-V2.5 with 1M token context. Coding performance is on par with Claude Sonnet 4.6 on SWE-Bench, but 40-60% more token-efficient. Highlights: cross-session memory, voice input, auto knowledge distillation. After the free period, you need a Token Plan subscription.
Pros
- βFree for 1 month, zero config
- βCoding on par with Claude Sonnet 4.6
- β40-60% more token-efficient than Claude
- β1M token context window
- βPersistent cross-session memory
- βVoice input and auto knowledge distillation
- βMIT open source, BYOK supported
Cons
- βFree for only 1 month
- βFree channel only gives V2.5, Pro requires payment
- βCredit multiplier is high β advertised 1.6B credits sounds more than it is
- βEcosystem still early, community building
- βReal-name auth required for paid plans
Key Features
Agnes AI
Sapiens AI's (Singapore) full-modality AI platform. Free Access tier: use frontier models for free. Text (Agnes 2.0 Flash, Claw-Eval #9 globally), Image (Agnes Image 2.0 Flash), Video (Agnes Video V2.0). Basic TPS limit, fair-use quota. Paid Token Plan for higher TPS and quotas.
Pros
- βText/image/video all free
- βText model Claw-Eval #9 globally
- βImage pricing was 1/10 of industry
- βFair-use, no hard cap
- βNo credit card needed
- βMulti-model cluster + smart routing lowers cost
Cons
- βBasic TPS limit, slower speed
- βNew platform, stability TBD
- βFree tier has no priority support
- βModel ecosystem smaller than OpenAI/Anthropic