Xiaomi MiMo Code vs bb-browser
Compare Xiaomi MiMo Code and bb-browser: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Xiaomi MiMo Code
Xiaomi's AI coding agent forked from OpenCode, open-sourced under MIT. The killer feature is the built-in MiMo Auto channel β zero config, free for 1 month, runs MiMo-V2.5 with 1M token context. Coding performance is on par with Claude Sonnet 4.6 on SWE-Bench, but 40-60% more token-efficient. Highlights: cross-session memory, voice input, auto knowledge distillation. After the free period, you need a Token Plan subscription.
Pros
- βFree for 1 month, zero config
- βCoding on par with Claude Sonnet 4.6
- β40-60% more token-efficient than Claude
- β1M token context window
- βPersistent cross-session memory
- βVoice input and auto knowledge distillation
- βMIT open source, BYOK supported
Cons
- βFree for only 1 month
- βFree channel only gives V2.5, Pro requires payment
- βCredit multiplier is high β advertised 1.6B credits sounds more than it is
- βEcosystem still early, community building
- βReal-name auth required for paid plans
Key Features
bb-browser
Open-source tool: "Your browser is the API." CLI + MCP server for AI agents to control Chrome with your login state. No separate API keys needed β reuses your existing browser sessions. Perfect for developers who need AI to automate web tasks.
Pros
- βFree and open source (MIT)
- βReuses browser login state, no extra config
- βSupports CLI and MCP Server modes
- βEnables AI agents to operate real web pages
Cons
- βRequires local Chrome
- βDepends on Node.js
- βRelatively new project, ecosystem still growing