Xiaomi MiMo Code vs bb-browser

Compare Xiaomi MiMo Code and bb-browser: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?

Category
LLM
Coding Assistant
Rating
⭐ 4.5
⭐ 4
Free Credits
1 month (MiMo-V2.5, 1M context). Platform signup bonus valid 40 days, invite friends for $2 each
999999 unlimited
Refresh Period
one-time
unlimited
Resolution
N/A
N/A
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
No
Yes
Paid From
Token Plan Lite and up
Completely free

Xiaomi MiMo Code

Xiaomi's AI coding agent forked from OpenCode, open-sourced under MIT. The killer feature is the built-in MiMo Auto channel β€” zero config, free for 1 month, runs MiMo-V2.5 with 1M token context. Coding performance is on par with Claude Sonnet 4.6 on SWE-Bench, but 40-60% more token-efficient. Highlights: cross-session memory, voice input, auto knowledge distillation. After the free period, you need a Token Plan subscription.

Pros

  • βœ“Free for 1 month, zero config
  • βœ“Coding on par with Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • βœ“40-60% more token-efficient than Claude
  • βœ“1M token context window
  • βœ“Persistent cross-session memory
  • βœ“Voice input and auto knowledge distillation
  • βœ“MIT open source, BYOK supported

Cons

  • βœ—Free for only 1 month
  • βœ—Free channel only gives V2.5, Pro requires payment
  • βœ—Credit multiplier is high β€” advertised 1.6B credits sounds more than it is
  • βœ—Ecosystem still early, community building
  • βœ—Real-name auth required for paid plans

Key Features

MiMo Auto zero-config free channelCross-session persistent memory (SQLite FTS5)Compose mode for spec-driven developmentVoice input (TenVAD + MiMo ASR)/dream auto knowledge extraction + /distill skill miningGoal stop-condition verificationSubagent parallel system1M token context windowMIT open source
View Details β†’

bb-browser

Open-source tool: "Your browser is the API." CLI + MCP server for AI agents to control Chrome with your login state. No separate API keys needed β€” reuses your existing browser sessions. Perfect for developers who need AI to automate web tasks.

Pros

  • βœ“Free and open source (MIT)
  • βœ“Reuses browser login state, no extra config
  • βœ“Supports CLI and MCP Server modes
  • βœ“Enables AI agents to operate real web pages

Cons

  • βœ—Requires local Chrome
  • βœ—Depends on Node.js
  • βœ—Relatively new project, ecosystem still growing

Key Features

CLI toolMCP Server integrationChrome browser controlLogin state reuseAI Agent automation
View Details β†’