Xiaomi MiMo Code vs Huawei DevEco Code
Compare Xiaomi MiMo Code and Huawei DevEco Code: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Xiaomi MiMo Code
Xiaomi's AI coding agent forked from OpenCode, open-sourced under MIT. The killer feature is the built-in MiMo Auto channel β zero config, free for 1 month, runs MiMo-V2.5 with 1M token context. Coding performance is on par with Claude Sonnet 4.6 on SWE-Bench, but 40-60% more token-efficient. Highlights: cross-session memory, voice input, auto knowledge distillation. After the free period, you need a Token Plan subscription.γ
Pros
- βFree for 1 month, zero config
- βCoding on par with Claude Sonnet 4.6
- β40-60% more token-efficient than Claude
- β1M token context window
- βPersistent cross-session memory
- βVoice input and auto knowledge distillation
- βMIT open source, BYOK supported
Cons
- βFree for only 1 month
- βFree channel only gives V2.5, Pro requires payment
- βCredit multiplier is high β advertised 1.6B credits sounds more than it is
- βEcosystem still early, community building
- βReal-name auth required for paid plans
Key Features
Huawei DevEco Code
Huawei CLI coding assistant with built-in Zhipu GLM-4.6 model, ready to use after login with no manual selection needed. Completely free with no usage limits, trained on Huawei Ascend chips, coding capability reaches 94.6% of Claude Opus 4.6. Rich theme options with dark/light mode switching, great looking interface.γ
Pros
- βCompletely free with no limits, no queuing
- βGLM-4.6 coding capability near Claude Opus
- βnpm install, 3 minutes to start
- βBased on Huawei Ascend chips, domestic autonomous
- βNot tied to HarmonyOS development, works for general coding
Cons
- βStandalone CLI tool, cannot integrate with Cursor/Claude Code
- βCurrently positioned as HarmonyOS development assistant
- βModel capability not as strong as Claude Opus/GPT-4o