Xiaomi MiMo Code vs SiliconFlow
Compare Xiaomi MiMo Code and SiliconFlow: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Xiaomi MiMo Code
Xiaomi's AI coding agent forked from OpenCode, open-sourced under MIT. The killer feature is the built-in MiMo Auto channel β zero config, free for 1 month, runs MiMo-V2.5 with 1M token context. Coding performance is on par with Claude Sonnet 4.6 on SWE-Bench, but 40-60% more token-efficient. Highlights: cross-session memory, voice input, auto knowledge distillation. After the free period, you need a Token Plan subscription.
Pros
- βFree for 1 month, zero config
- βCoding on par with Claude Sonnet 4.6
- β40-60% more token-efficient than Claude
- β1M token context window
- βPersistent cross-session memory
- βVoice input and auto knowledge distillation
- βMIT open source, BYOK supported
Cons
- βFree for only 1 month
- βFree channel only gives V2.5, Pro requires payment
- βCredit multiplier is high β advertised 1.6B credits sounds more than it is
- βEcosystem still early, community building
- βReal-name auth required for paid plans
Key Features
SiliconFlow
Chinese API aggregation platform unifying open-source models under one interface. Free tier: RPM 500, TPM 2M, supporting DeepSeek, Qwen, GLM and more. Saves the trouble of self-hosting open-source models, with fast domestic access.
Pros
- βAccessible from China without VPN
- βHigh concurrency: RPM 500
- βFree models include GLM-Z1-9B and more
- βUnified interface for easy model switching
Cons
- βLimited number of free models
- βSome models require payment
- βRegistration needed for API token