Xiaomi MiMo Code vs Tabbit
Compare Xiaomi MiMo Code and Tabbit: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Xiaomi MiMo Code
Xiaomi's AI coding agent forked from OpenCode, open-sourced under MIT. The killer feature is the built-in MiMo Auto channel β zero config, free for 1 month, runs MiMo-V2.5 with 1M token context. Coding performance is on par with Claude Sonnet 4.6 on SWE-Bench, but 40-60% more token-efficient. Highlights: cross-session memory, voice input, auto knowledge distillation. After the free period, you need a Token Plan subscription.
Pros
- βFree for 1 month, zero config
- βCoding on par with Claude Sonnet 4.6
- β40-60% more token-efficient than Claude
- β1M token context window
- βPersistent cross-session memory
- βVoice input and auto knowledge distillation
- βMIT open source, BYOK supported
Cons
- βFree for only 1 month
- βFree channel only gives V2.5, Pro requires payment
- βCredit multiplier is high β advertised 1.6B credits sounds more than it is
- βEcosystem still early, community building
- βReal-name auth required for paid plans
Key Features
Tabbit
An AI browser built from the ground up by Meituan's Light Years team β not a Chrome extension with a sidebar, but AI woven into every layer. Chat with AI while browsing, referencing pages, screenshots, or local files. Built-in Agent automates repetitive tasks like form filling and data collection. Create custom Skills for your workflows. Standard version is free forever with ~1000 AI chats/week, 50 images, and 10 Agent tasks.
Pros
- βStandard version is free forever with generous limits
- βAI is deeply integrated, not just a sidebar
- βBuilt-in Agent automates repetitive tasks
- βCustom Skills let you build personalized workflows
- βSupports GPT-5.2, Claude-Sonnet-4.6, and other top models
Cons
- βJust launched β ecosystem still maturing
- βDesktop only, no mobile app yet
- βAgent capabilities are still basic