Xiaomi MiMo Code vs Tencent Marvis
Compare Xiaomi MiMo Code and Tencent Marvis: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Xiaomi MiMo Code
Xiaomi's AI coding agent forked from OpenCode, open-sourced under MIT. The killer feature is the built-in MiMo Auto channel β zero config, free for 1 month, runs MiMo-V2.5 with 1M token context. Coding performance is on par with Claude Sonnet 4.6 on SWE-Bench, but 40-60% more token-efficient. Highlights: cross-session memory, voice input, auto knowledge distillation. After the free period, you need a Token Plan subscription.
Pros
- βFree for 1 month, zero config
- βCoding on par with Claude Sonnet 4.6
- β40-60% more token-efficient than Claude
- β1M token context window
- βPersistent cross-session memory
- βVoice input and auto knowledge distillation
- βMIT open source, BYOK supported
Cons
- βFree for only 1 month
- βFree channel only gives V2.5, Pro requires payment
- βCredit multiplier is high β advertised 1.6B credits sounds more than it is
- βEcosystem still early, community building
- βReal-name auth required for paid plans
Key Features
Tencent Marvis
Operating system-level AI assistant by Tencent's App Store team. Fully launched May 21. 10M free tokens daily, powered by DeepSeek V4 and Hunyuan models. Windows, Mac, Android. Privacy mode (local model, zero upload) and efficiency mode (cloud-edge). 8 built-in agents for file search, system settings, remote control, document processing.
Pros
- βCompletely free, 10M tokens daily
- βOS-level agent, truly controls PC
- βPrivacy mode, zero file upload
- βPhone remote control of PC
- β8 built-in agents, ready to use
- βDeepSeek V4 + Hunyuan dual models
Cons
- βRequires 16GB RAM minimum
- βMac needs M1 or newer
- βiOS not yet available (mid-June)
- βTencent ecosystem lock-in risk