Zhipu CogView vs Groq
Compare Zhipu CogView and Groq: free credits, features, and ratings. Which one is right for you?
Category
Image Generation
API Platform
Rating
β 3
β 5
Free Credits
100 100 credits
1000 requests/day
Refresh Period
daily
daily
Resolution
1024x1024
Watermark
No
No
Commercial Use
Yes
Yes
Paid From
Free
Pay-as-you-go
Zhipu CogView
Zhipu AI's image generation model, available directly in ChatGLM. Free daily credits, strong Chinese prompt understanding.
Pros
- βBest Chinese prompt understanding
- βNo separate registration
- βUse directly in ChatGLM
- βFree
Cons
- βQuality below professional tools
- βRelatively simple features
- βLimited resolution
Key Features
Text to ImageDirect use in ChatGLMStrong Chinese understandingMultiple stylesFree to use
Groq
Groq uses custom LPU chips for inference, delivering speeds several times faster than standard GPUs. Free tier offers 1000 requests/day with Llama, Qwen, and other open-source models. If you need real-time response speed for chat or streaming, Groq is currently the fastest free inference service available.
Pros
- βExtremely fast inference with custom LPU hardware
- βGenerous free tier: 1000 requests/day
- βSupports popular open-source models (Llama, Qwen, etc.)
- βOpenAI-compatible API format
Cons
- βRequires VPN from China
- βOnly open-source models, no GPT/Claude
- βFree tier has concurrency and TPM limits
Key Features
LPU Hardware Inference17 Free ModelsOpenAI-Compatible APIStreaming OutputWhisper Speech-to-Text